",{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"Person","@id":"https://amit.marketing/#person","name":"Amit Sharma","url":"https://amit.marketing/","description":"Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.","jobTitle":"Licensed Real Estate Salesperson","address":{"@type":"PostalAddress","addressLocality":"Auckland","addressCountry":"NZ"},"knowsAbout":["Auckland property","Residential rents","Real estate marketing","Social media marketing","Indian nutrition","Fitness and training"],"sameAs":["https://www.youtube.com/@AmitSharmanz","https://www.facebook.com/AmitSharmaNZ","https://www.instagram.com/amitsharmaofficial","https://www.tiktok.com/@amitsharmanz"]}]
Part of the data ring
NameCurve
Girls' name · 212 recorded births

Jo-Ann

212 NZ births on record

#223its best NZ rank, in 1960
1965peak year — 19 births
212NZ births since 1956
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

Jo-Ann in the United States

Between 1963 and 1972 the name has been steady.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Jo-Ann in New Zealand

In New Zealand, Jo-Ann has been registered 212 times since 1956, peaking in 1965 with 19 births. It did not clear the DIA's 10-birth reporting floor in 2025.

0.040791900192019401960198020002020
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. Jo-Ann in New Zealand, 1900–2025

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

How these figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. Each country hides small numbers — the US below 5 births a year, New Zealand below 10. A gap in a line is "below the floor", never "nobody".

Full methodology →

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.