",{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"Person","@id":"https://amit.marketing/#person","name":"Amit Sharma","url":"https://amit.marketing/","description":"Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.","jobTitle":"Licensed Real Estate Salesperson","address":{"@type":"PostalAddress","addressLocality":"Auckland","addressCountry":"NZ"},"knowsAbout":["Auckland property","Residential rents","Real estate marketing","Social media marketing","Indian nutrition","Fitness and training"],"sameAs":["https://www.youtube.com/@AmitSharmanz","https://www.facebook.com/AmitSharmaNZ","https://www.instagram.com/amitsharmaofficial","https://www.tiktok.com/@amitsharmanz"]}]
Part of the data ring
NameCurve
Girls' name · 1,070 recorded births

Keela

#14,942 in the US in 2025

#14,942US rank, 2025 (girls)
5US births in 2025
#2,396its best US rank, in 1974
1978peak year — 33 births
1,070US births since 1956
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

Keela in the United States

0.01.12.218801900192019401960198020002020
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. Keela in the United States, 1880–2025

Between 2014 and 2025 the name has been falling — down 60% as a share of girls' births.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Keela in New Zealand

Keela never reached 10 births in a single year in New Zealand, so it does not appear in the DIA file. That is a reporting floor, not a zero — the name may still have been registered here, just never ten times in one year.

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

YearRankBirths
1960#2,98917
1970#2,85624
1980#4,51716
1990#3,43631
2000below floor
2010#8,70113
2020#13,4536

Where in the United States

The states that registered Keela most often since 1956. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

StateBirths
Tennessee7
Alabama5
Georgia5

How these figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. Each country hides small numbers — the US below 5 births a year, New Zealand below 10. A gap in a line is "below the floor", never "nobody".

Full methodology →

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.