",{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"Person","@id":"https://amit.marketing/#person","name":"Amit Sharma","url":"https://amit.marketing/","description":"Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.","jobTitle":"Licensed Real Estate Salesperson","address":{"@type":"PostalAddress","addressLocality":"Auckland","addressCountry":"NZ"},"knowsAbout":["Auckland property","Residential rents","Real estate marketing","Social media marketing","Indian nutrition","Fitness and training"],"sameAs":["https://www.youtube.com/@AmitSharmanz","https://www.facebook.com/AmitSharmaNZ","https://www.instagram.com/amitsharmaofficial","https://www.tiktok.com/@amitsharmanz"]}]
Part of the data ring
NameCurve
Boys' name · 1,298 recorded births

Arnett

1,298 US births on record

#652its best US rank, in 1897
1951peak year — 35 births
1,298US births since 1893
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

Arnett in the United States

0.04.99.818801900192019401960198020002020
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. Arnett in the United States, 1880–2025

Between 1983 and 2006 the name has been steady.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Arnett in New Zealand

Arnett never reached 10 births in a single year in New Zealand, so it does not appear in the DIA file. That is a reporting floor, not a zero — the name may still have been registered here, just never ten times in one year.

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

YearRankBirths
1900#1,3105
1910#1,5895
1920#1,69421
1930#2,17813
1940#1,62718
1950#1,81517
1960#2,31513
1970#3,2829
1980#3,09814
1990#7,1786
2000below floor
2010below floor
2020below floor

Where in the United States

The states that registered Arnett most often since 1893. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

How these figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. Each country hides small numbers — the US below 5 births a year, New Zealand below 10. A gap in a line is "below the floor", never "nobody".

Full methodology →

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.