Marlow
#2,304 in the US in 2025
Marlow in the United States
Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been rising — up 190% as a share of boys' births.
Marlow is given to both sexes: 2,253 male and 1,903 female births on record. The two curves rarely move together, which is why they are drawn separately rather than summed.
SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026
Marlow in New Zealand
In New Zealand, Marlow has been registered 60 times since 2019, peaking in 2024 with 14 births. It ranked #346 for boys in 2025 on 13 births.
SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026
Decade by decade in the US
| Year | Rank | Births |
|---|---|---|
| 1910 | #1,589 | 5 |
| 1920 | #2,765 | 10 |
| 1930 | #1,821 | 17 |
| 1940 | #1,397 | 23 |
| 1950 | #2,111 | 13 |
| 1960 | #1,772 | 21 |
| 1970 | #1,615 | 28 |
| 1980 | #2,536 | 19 |
| 1990 | #4,167 | 13 |
| 2000 | #6,839 | 9 |
| 2010 | #3,994 | 25 |
| 2020 | #3,918 | 26 |
Where in the United States
The states that registered Marlow most often since 1910. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.
| State | Births |
|---|---|
| California | 71 |
| Minnesota | 33 |
| New York | 28 |
| Illinois | 11 |
| Texas | 10 |
| Washington | 7 |
| Florida | 5 |
| Michigan | 5 |
| North Dakota | 5 |
| Oklahoma | 5 |
How these figures are worked out
- Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site.
- Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
- The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
- Each country hides small numbers — the US below 5 births a year, New Zealand below 10. A gap in a line is "below the floor", never "nobody".
SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026