Oakley
#156 in the US in 2025
Oakley in the United States
Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been rising — up 298% as a share of girls' births.
Oakley is given to both sexes: 15,474 female and 11,932 male births on record. The two curves rarely move together, which is why they are drawn separately rather than summed.
SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026
Oakley in New Zealand
In New Zealand, Oakley has been registered 114 times since 2019, peaking in 2021 with 22 births. It ranked #333 for girls in 2025 on 12 births.
SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026
Decade by decade in the US
| Year | Rank | Births |
|---|---|---|
| 1920 | #4,398 | 6 |
| 1930 | below floor | — |
| 1940 | below floor | — |
| 1950 | below floor | — |
| 1960 | below floor | — |
| 1970 | below floor | — |
| 1980 | below floor | — |
| 1990 | below floor | — |
| 2000 | #4,527 | 26 |
| 2010 | #1,751 | 118 |
| 2020 | #284 | 1,128 |
Where in the United States
The states that registered Oakley most often since 1913. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.
| State | Births |
|---|---|
| Utah | 1,540 |
| Texas | 859 |
| Ohio | 833 |
| Indiana | 551 |
| Tennessee | 548 |
| Michigan | 531 |
| Missouri | 514 |
| Idaho | 505 |
| California | 501 |
| Florida | 474 |
How these figures are worked out
- Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site.
- Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
- The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
- Each country hides small numbers — the US below 5 births a year, New Zealand below 10. A gap in a line is "below the floor", never "nobody".
SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026