Elba
#10,917 in the US in 2025
Elba in the United States
Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been steady.
SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026
Elba in New Zealand
Elba never reached 10 births in a single year in New Zealand, so it does not appear in the DIA file. That is a reporting floor, not a zero — the name may still have been registered here, just never ten times in one year.
SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026
Decade by decade in the US
| Year | Rank | Births |
|---|---|---|
| 1890 | #1,210 | 6 |
| 1900 | #1,723 | 6 |
| 1910 | #1,773 | 8 |
| 1920 | #1,375 | 33 |
| 1930 | #1,434 | 29 |
| 1940 | #2,737 | 10 |
| 1950 | #1,550 | 36 |
| 1960 | #1,405 | 61 |
| 1970 | #1,653 | 56 |
| 1980 | #2,486 | 38 |
| 1990 | #2,640 | 44 |
| 2000 | #5,312 | 21 |
| 2010 | #9,790 | 11 |
| 2020 | #13,453 | 6 |
Where in the United States
The states that registered Elba most often since 1888. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.
| State | Births |
|---|---|
| New York | 922 |
| California | 405 |
| New Jersey | 99 |
| Texas | 86 |
| Illinois | 55 |
| Oklahoma | 6 |
| Kentucky | 5 |
| Massachusetts | 5 |
| Pennsylvania | 5 |
How these figures are worked out
- Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site.
- Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
- The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
- Each country hides small numbers — the US below 5 births a year, New Zealand below 10. A gap in a line is "below the floor", never "nobody".
SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026