Francisco
#322 in the US in 2025
Francisco in the United States
Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been steady.
SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026
Francisco in New Zealand
Francisco never reached 10 births in a single year in New Zealand, so it does not appear in the DIA file. That is a reporting floor, not a zero — the name may still have been registered here, just never ten times in one year.
SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026
Decade by decade in the US
| Year | Rank | Births |
|---|---|---|
| 1880 | #392 | 19 |
| 1890 | #434 | 17 |
| 1900 | #343 | 40 |
| 1910 | #304 | 65 |
| 1920 | #298 | 359 |
| 1930 | #255 | 476 |
| 1940 | #326 | 303 |
| 1950 | #254 | 647 |
| 1960 | #284 | 778 |
| 1970 | #209 | 1,218 |
| 1980 | #154 | 1,769 |
| 1990 | #115 | 2,934 |
| 2000 | #139 | 2,837 |
| 2010 | #197 | 1,876 |
| 2020 | #296 | 1,148 |
Where in the United States
The states that registered Francisco most often since 1880. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.
| State | Births |
|---|---|
| California | 46,533 |
| Texas | 36,767 |
| Arizona | 8,803 |
| New York | 8,160 |
| Illinois | 6,196 |
| Florida | 4,833 |
| New Mexico | 2,668 |
| New Jersey | 2,310 |
| Colorado | 2,029 |
| Washington | 1,741 |
How these figures are worked out
- Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site.
- Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
- The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
- Each country hides small numbers — the US below 5 births a year, New Zealand below 10. A gap in a line is "below the floor", never "nobody".
SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026