",{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"Person","@id":"https://amit.marketing/#person","name":"Amit Sharma","url":"https://amit.marketing/","description":"Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.","jobTitle":"Licensed Real Estate Salesperson","address":{"@type":"PostalAddress","addressLocality":"Auckland","addressCountry":"NZ"},"knowsAbout":["Auckland property","Residential rents","Real estate marketing","Social media marketing","Indian nutrition","Fitness and training"],"sameAs":["https://www.youtube.com/@AmitSharmanz","https://www.facebook.com/AmitSharmaNZ","https://www.instagram.com/amitsharmaofficial","https://www.tiktok.com/@amitsharmanz"]}]
Part of the data ring
NameCurve
Boys' name · 6,119 recorded births

Musa

#469 in the US in 2025

#469US rank, 2025 (boys)
651US births in 2025
#469its best US rank, in 2025
2025peak year — 651 births
6,109US births since 1970
10NZ births since 2025
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

Musa in the United States

0.0193818801900192019401960198020002020
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. Musa in the United States, 1880–2025

Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been rising — up 230% as a share of boys' births.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Musa in New Zealand

In New Zealand, Musa has been registered 10 times since 2025, peaking in 2025 with 10 births. It ranked #432 for boys in 2025 on 10 births.

0.032631900192019401960198020002020
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. Musa in New Zealand, 1900–2025

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

YearRankBirths
1970#4,7245
1980#3,25613
1990#3,16619
2000#1,99351
2010#1,316130
2020#744326

Where in the United States

The states that registered Musa most often since 1970. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

How these figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. Each country hides small numbers — the US below 5 births a year, New Zealand below 10. A gap in a line is "below the floor", never "nobody".

Full methodology →

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.