Santana
#855 in the US in 2025
Santana in the United States
Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been steady.
Santana is given to both sexes: 7,797 male and 6,177 female births on record. The two curves rarely move together, which is why they are drawn separately rather than summed.
SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026
Santana in New Zealand
In New Zealand, Santana has been registered 12 times since 2000, peaking in 2000 with 12 births. It did not clear the DIA's 10-birth reporting floor in 2025.
SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026
Decade by decade in the US
| Year | Rank | Births |
|---|---|---|
| 1920 | #3,208 | 8 |
| 1930 | #3,022 | 8 |
| 1940 | below floor | — |
| 1950 | #3,329 | 6 |
| 1960 | #4,038 | 5 |
| 1970 | #2,891 | 11 |
| 1980 | #1,910 | 29 |
| 1990 | #2,128 | 34 |
| 2000 | #1,125 | 124 |
| 2010 | #1,200 | 149 |
| 2020 | #542 | 522 |
Where in the United States
The states that registered Santana most often since 1915. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.
| State | Births |
|---|---|
| Texas | 1,239 |
| California | 988 |
| Florida | 352 |
| Ohio | 319 |
| Illinois | 297 |
| Colorado | 233 |
| Arizona | 225 |
| North Carolina | 212 |
| Michigan | 211 |
| Virginia | 200 |
How these figures are worked out
- Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site.
- Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
- The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
- Each country hides small numbers — the US below 5 births a year, New Zealand below 10. A gap in a line is "below the floor", never "nobody".
SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026