",{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"Person","@id":"https://amit.marketing/#person","name":"Amit Sharma","url":"https://amit.marketing/","description":"Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.","jobTitle":"Licensed Real Estate Salesperson","address":{"@type":"PostalAddress","addressLocality":"Auckland","addressCountry":"NZ"},"knowsAbout":["Auckland property","Residential rents","Real estate marketing","Social media marketing","Indian nutrition","Fitness and training"],"sameAs":["https://www.youtube.com/@AmitSharmanz","https://www.facebook.com/AmitSharmaNZ","https://www.instagram.com/amitsharmaofficial","https://www.tiktok.com/@amitsharmanz"]}]
Part of the data ring
NameCurve
Boys' name · 4,621 recorded births

Boris

#3,181 in the US in 2025

#3,181US rank, 2025 (boys)
37US births in 2025
#871its best US rank, in 1962
1970peak year — 82 births
4,621US births since 1911
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

Boris in the United States

0.02.34.618801900192019401960198020002020
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. Boris in the United States, 1880–2025

Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been steady.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Boris in New Zealand

Boris never reached 10 births in a single year in New Zealand, so it does not appear in the DIA file. That is a reporting floor, not a zero — the name may still have been registered here, just never ten times in one year.

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

YearRankBirths
1920#1,34829
1930#1,23533
1940#2,17911
1950#2,5809
1960#1,29537
1970#89182
1980#1,80831
1990#1,54754
2000#1,87556
2010#2,57947
2020#2,54650

Where in the United States

The states that registered Boris most often since 1911. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

How these figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. Each country hides small numbers — the US below 5 births a year, New Zealand below 10. A gap in a line is "below the floor", never "nobody".

Full methodology →

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.